Legal Opinion

Luker v. Kells

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1966No. 40977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

Plaintiff in error, defendant in the trial court, has appealed from a judgment entered for defendant in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, in an action brought to *513recover upon a promissory note. The appeal to this Court is upon the original record

Plaintiff alleged defendant’s execution and delivery of a promissory note in the amount of $3,600.00, dated January 1, 1960, payable upon demand according to terms of the instrument; plaintiff was the owner and holder thereof and default had been made in that defendant had refused to pay upon demand; that the note provided for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  2. Dowdy v. ClausewitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. First Nat. Bank of Muskogee v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Milburn v. Miners' & Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. WoffordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leche v. Ponca City Production Credit AssociationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API