Luker v. Kells
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
Plaintiff in error, defendant in the trial court, has appealed from a judgment entered for defendant in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, in an action brought to *513recover upon a promissory note. The appeal to this Court is upon the original record
Plaintiff alleged defendant’s execution and delivery of a promissory note in the amount of $3,600.00, dated January 1, 1960, payable upon demand according to terms of the instrument; plaintiff was the owner and holder thereof and default had been made in that defendant had refused to pay upon demand; that the note provided for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- Dowdy v. ClausewitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- First Nat. Bank of Muskogee v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Milburn v. Miners' & Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. WoffordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leche v. Ponca City Production Credit AssociationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1967