Mitchell v. Kim
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Colusa County denying a motion for a change of venue. Ernest Weyand, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Motion to change the place of trial. The motion was denied and defendant Cross appeals from the order. The action was commenced in the superior court of Colusa County. The motion was made “upon the grounds that defendant, P. B. Cross, is, and at the time of the commencement of the above-entitled action was, a resident of the city and county of San Francisco.”
It is alleged in the complaint that Kim and Porter, at the times mentioned in the complaint and at the commencement of the action, were copartners; that defendants became indebted to plaintiffs in the sum of $4,960.01 “for the building…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McKenzie v. BarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hellman v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Lakeshore Cattle Co. v. Modoc Land & Livestock Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Quint v. DimondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Bowers v. Modoc Land & Live Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Monogram Co. v. KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- California Collection Agency, Inc. v. FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Carnation Co. v. El Rey Cheese Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Pacific Coast Automobile Assn. v. AhlfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.