Legal Opinion
Hellman v. Logan
California Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 1905No. S.F. No. 3452PublishedCited by 26 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendants appeal from an order denying their application for a change of the place of trial of the action.
The suit was begun in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco. A. D. Logan was then, and still is. a resident of Glenn County, and the Grangers’ Business Association was then, and still is, a resident of San Francisco. The ground of the motion is that Logan being a resident of Glenn County, the city and county of San Francisco is not the proper place of trial, under section 395 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The complaint states a cause of action upon a promissory…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sayward v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Quint v. DimondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Greenleaf v. JacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- McClung v. WattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Freeman v. DowlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Monogram Co. v. KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Independent Iron Works, Inc. v. American President Lines, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.