Legal Opinion

Monogram Co. v. Kingsley

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1951No. S. F. 18446PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying motions made by certain defendants for a change of venue from the county of Alameda to the county of Los Angeles. There is no dispute as to the material facts, and it appears therefrom that the challenged ruling should be sustained.

Plaintiffs brought this action for libel, slander and unfair competition in the county of Alameda, where one of the defendants, Lewis, admittedly resides. All of the other defendants reside in the county of Los Angeles. The complaint contains 20 counts, charging on behalf of each plaintiff various acts of libel and slander as…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McClung v. WattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Turlock Theatre Co. v. LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Donohoe v. WoosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Maxwell v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Rudnick v. DelfinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Channell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API