Smo v. Black
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action for a declaratory judgment to establish her right to an easement over defendants’ property. The dispute centers on plaintiffs rights to park on defendants’ land and to use a footbridge spanning the Smith River. The trial court ruled in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Defendants own a ranch of about 272 acres along the Smith River. Two acres, containing their residence, are located on the west side of the river along Smith River Road; the balance is across the river. Plaintiffs property also lies across the river…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Thompson v. SchuhOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Stone-Fox, Inc. v. Vandehey Development Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Rose Et Ux. v. Denn Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jackson v. NashNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Verzeano v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Hayward v. EllsworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Smo v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.