Legal Opinion

Bloomfield v. Weakland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 16, 2004No. 003497 and 003480; A119891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant owns an oceanfront lot, Lot 14, in Sea Woods Park, which is a subdivision near Waldport, Oregon. Plaintiffs are owners of other lots in the subdivision who sought a declaratory ruling that they have an implied easement to the beach over defendant’s property by virtue of a 1957 plat that depicted a 10-foot wide “Private Walk Way” over Lot 14. Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs on their implied easement claim. The court based the judgment on an order that granted plaintiffs summary judgment on their claims. Because we conclude that there are material issues of fact on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Carter v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Thompson v. SchuhOregon Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bloomfield v. WeaklandOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Farnsworth v. Meadowland Ranches, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Dayton v. JordanCoos County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  5. Manusos v. SkeelsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API