Legal Opinion

Stone-Fox, Inc. v. Vandehey Development Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1981No. 39-004, CA 14608, SC 27140PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*781TONGUE, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of an earnest money agreement to sell a tract of land. Plaintiff contends that Vernon Vandehey and Jack Leonard were partners for the purpose of the development and sale of that tract of land and that, as such, the act of Mr. Vandehey in signing that agreement was binding upon Mr. Leonard even though he did not sign the agreement.

The trial court held for the defendants based upon findings (1) that the evidence was insufficient to establish a partnership; (2) that an oral statement by Mr. Vandehey that he had authority to sell the property was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Cinderella Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Hayes v. KillingerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Wheatley v. Carl Halvorson, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Murphy v. RedlandMontana Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hooper v. YoderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Kristerin Development Co. v. Granson InvestmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  3. Fitzgibbon v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Radaker v. ScottNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  5. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PORT OF ASTORIA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API