Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Guleserian

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1972No. Civ. 39540PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.—This is an appeal from an order vacating an arbitrator’s award in an arbitration conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Uninsured Motorist Law. By reason of Orpustan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 7 Cal.3d 988 [103 Cal.Rptr. 919, 500 P.2d 1119], decided while this appeal was pending, we reverse the order of the trial court.

Respondent, State Farm, issued its policy of automobile liability insurance to Vahan Guleserian. The policy includes uninsured motorist coverage and provisions for arbitration. “Coverage U” of the policy provides in pertinent part that State…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. O'MALLEY v. Petroleum Maintenance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Orpustan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. BailesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Woodard v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Severtson v. Williams Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Marcus v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API