Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Woodard v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1985No. B007109PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Perry Woodard and Lenda Woodard (the Woodards) appeal the judgment confirming an arbitration award following arbitration with defendants and respondents, Southern California Permanente Medical Group and Peter B. Fischer, M.D. (SCPMG).

The superior court properly refused to correct the arbitration award to add costs of suit allowed by Code of Civil Procedure section 998 and interest pursuant to Civil Code section 3291 when the court confirmed the award. Those sections do not apply to arbitration, and assuming they did, mere arbitrator error in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ponder v. Blue Cross of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Lesser Towers, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Lehto v. Underground Constr. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gourley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Aalgaard v. Merchants National Bank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Coso Energy Developers v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. People v. WeatherillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Caro v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API