Legal Opinion
Bauman v. Castle
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 12, 1971No. Civ. 27048PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SHOEMAKER, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action against the guarantors of a promissory note following a nonjudicial sale under a second deed of trust of the property securing the note. Judgment was entered for defendants and plaintiff appeals.
The facts are essentially without dispute. Plaintiff John Bauman was the owner of an interest in an apartment building located in Redwood City, and in March 1964 the building was sold. For his interest in the property, plaintiff received $16,000 in cash, an assignment of the promissory note involved herein in the face amount of $40,000, which was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Bank v. GradskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Heckes v. SappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Union Bank v. BrummellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Katz v. HaskellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Lange v. AverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kahn v. LASORDA'S DUGOUT, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Prestige Ltd. Partnership-Concord v. East Bay Car Wash Partners (In Re Prestige Ltd. Partnership-Concord)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1997
- Consolidated Capital Income Trust v. KhaloghliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Indusco Management Corp. v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. BartonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.