Legal Opinion
Union Bank v. Brummell
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1969No. Civ. 9037PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCABE, P. J.
This is an action for a deficiency after non judicial sale against defendants alleging them to be guarantors of a secured note. On February 12, 1964, Efficient Investments, Inc. 1 by its president, defendant Ira Brummell, and secretary, defendant Max Dillman, executed in favor of Union Bank a note in the amount of $1,700,000 secured by a deed of trust. The trust deed encumbered property appraised by the bank at $2.100,000. This appraisal was made by the bank in December 1963. Defendants personally endorsed the note and, in addition, executed continuing guarantees.
On November 12, 1965, at the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Valinda Builders, Inc. v. BissnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Union Bank v. GradskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Riddle v. LushingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Torrey Pines Bank v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- River Bank America v. DillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Cal. Bank & Trust v. Lawlor CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Cathay Bank v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.