Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. Barton

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 20, 1992No. SACV 90-818-GLT (RWRx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TAYLOR, District Judge..This case is one in a series testing the scope of California’s anti-deficiency statutes (Code of Civil Procedure §§ 580a-580d and 726). It presents the novel question whether § 580d, which prohibits a deficiency judgment after non-judicial foreclosure of real property, applies to a guarantor who is also a general partner of a partnership primary debtor if the loan is “non-recourse.” The court holds the “non-recourse” provision does not prevent operation of the anti-deficiency statute, and grants summary judgment for defendant.

I.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Valinda Builders, Inc. v. BissnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Union Bank v. GradskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Torrey Pines Bank v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Commonwealth Mortgage Assurance Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Pritam SinghCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Prestige Ltd. Partnership-Concord v. East Bay Car Wash Partners (In Re Prestige Ltd. Partnership-Concord)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1997
  3. In re BrockUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2013
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Pritam SinghCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API