Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Hoan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

This appeal presents no disputed facts. Plaintiff is a member of the Progressive party and a resident of the city of Milwaukee. He brings this action on his own behalf and on that of electors of the Progressive party in the city of Milwaukee and state of Wisconsin. The defendant Daniel W. Hoan is the mayor of Milwaukee. The other defendants are members of the election commission. The defendant Schuffenhauer, representing the Socialist party, was appointed for a term of three years commencing July 1, 1932. The defendant Cassidy, representing the Democratic party, was appointed for a term of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State ex rel. Wood v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Bell v. City of PlattevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Riebs Co. v. MortensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Hobbins v. HannanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. EACRET ET UX v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Danforth v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Marshall v. HillSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Boerschinger v. Elkay Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Sova v. RiesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API