Riebs Co. v. Mortensen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
It is the view of the court that the allegations of the complaint are insufficient to show the existence of a controversy or any basis for declaratory relief.
Plaintiff is a manufacturer, and desires to have written and issued to it such policies protecting against interruption of use by fire as its peculiar needs call for. The insurance companies, in consequence of the rulings of defendants, decline to issue such policies or to issue any policy except upon the standard form having defendants’ approval. We are unable, upon these facts, to discover a controversy. There certainly is no…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heller v. ShapiroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- State ex rel. Ekern v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Village of Sun Prairie v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wisconsin Pharmaceutical Asso. v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- New Discoveries, Inc. v. Wisconsin Alumni Research FoundationDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1936
- Rose Manor Realty Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- McCarthy v. HoanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Sova v. RiesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.