Legal Opinion

People v. H & H PROPERTIES

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1984No. Civ. 65067PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Plaintiff and appellant People of the State of California (People) appeal from an order granting defendant and respondent H&H Properties’ (H & H) demurrer without leave to amend to the fourth and fifth causes of action in the People’s complaint for injunction, civil penalties and other equitable relief.

Since H & H’s rights to proceed with its condominium conversion had vested prior to the enactment of the Los Angeles County Rent Control Ordinance, it could go forward but only subject to compliance with the ordinance. Therefore, the fourth and fifth causes of action are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Youngblood v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bugg v. Maryland Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Channing Properties v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Coyne v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Adkins v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Blue Chip Properties v. Permanent Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Pieri v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API