Legal Opinion

Adkins v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1996No. B085106PublishedCited by 12 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

This case comes to us after the trial court granted a nonsuit in favor of defendant and respondent State of California (the State) at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ opening statement. The court entered judgment finding the State was immune from liability under the Emergency Services Act. The primary issue we address is whether the State is immune from liability under the Emergency Services Act for intentionally lying to persons about the health and safety of chemicals they handled during a state emergency to eradicate an infestation of pests. We conclude in such situations…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. City of Moorpark v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Tudor Ranches, Inc. v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. City of Costa Mesa v. D'Alessio InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Stein-Brief Group, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API