Ex parte Hollis
California Supreme Court
Application for discharge upon writ of habeas corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
McKee, J.:
This is an application on habeas corpus to be discharged from imprisonment under a commitment issued upon a judgment, in proceedings for contempt, rendered by the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, against the petitioner.
Of the office and effect of a writ of habeas corpus, under our system of jurisprudence, there can not be, at this day, much question. It has been, indeed, contended that after *407judgment in a criminal case of a Court of competent jurisdiction a prisoner can not be discharged on habeas corpus, because the judgment is conclusive. Of course, where a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- People Ex Rel. Tweed v. . LiscombNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Smith v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Ex parte KearnyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People ex rel. Mulford v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- McClatchy v. Superior Court of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Safer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Ex parte Ah MenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Miskimmins v. ShaverWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.