Francisco v. Aguirre
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
In October, 1888, Mrs. M. E. Edmonston, being the owner of certain household furniture then situate in the Ramsay House, at Los Ángeles, executed a bill of sale thereof to Martha O’Hara for the sum of $825, and at the same time received from her a lease of the same furniture until February 1, 1889, that being *181the date at which a lease of the Ramsay House would expire. On the first day of February, 1889, Mrs. O’Hara made demand of Mrs. Bdmonston for the possession of the furniture, and upon being refused such possession, on the next day began an action of claim and delivery therefor. At the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Warner v. . JaffrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Van Heusen Charles v. . RadcliffNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Brownell v. CurtisNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
- Keller v. Smalley & HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Estabrook v. MessersmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Moore v. SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- First National Bank v. Pomona Tile Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- George v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Peterson v. BallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- First National Bank v. MenkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.