Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 2, 2000No. AC 17677PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUPONT, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Joseph Taylor, from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of the plaintiff, Carol Taylor, to compel the defendant specifically to perform the terms of the parties’ separation agreement pertaining to certain stock options. The agreement was executed in connection with an action for the dissolution of the marriage of the parties. The primary issue is whether the stock options to be divided, as provided in the *530agreement, include both exercisable and nonexercisable options. The defendant also appeals from the denial of his motion…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Issler v. IsslerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Bunche v. BuncheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mickey v. MickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Cheverie v. Ashcraft & GerelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Santoro v. SantoroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Baris v. Southbend, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Kremenitzer v. KremenitzerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API