Legal Opinion

Santoro v. Santoro

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 4, 2002No. AC 21550PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHALAKOS, J.

The defendant, Regina Santoro, now known as Regina Zamblauskas, appeals from the judgment of the trial court ordering the plaintiff, Donato Santoro, to pay her $5495 in exchange for the defendant’s quitclaiming to him certain property valued at $30,000. The sole issue on appeal is whether the court improperly offset a balance due for child support from the defendant to the plaintiff against a lump sum property settlement due from the plaintiff to the defendant in a matter in which the parties had appeared before the family support magistrate and agreed to a weekly payment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Bunche v. BuncheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. Jaser v. JaserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stechel v. FosterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Pritchard v. PritchardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Richards v. RichardsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Roos v. RoosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Wasson v. WassonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API