Legal Opinion
Lord v. Saratoga Capital, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided November 14, 1995No. 94-2129/BraMlPublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
McCALLA, District Judge.
PROCEDURAL POSTURE
On July 29, 1995, both defendants, Saratoga Capital, Inc., (“Saratoga”) and Sun Pac, submitted motions for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on all six causes of action alleged by plaintiff, Juanita Lord, in her Third Amended Complaint. On August 30, 1995, plaintiff filed answers to defendants’ motions. On October 31, 1995, the Court held a hearing on the motions. Plaintiff and defendants have briefed the pertinent legal issues.
FACTS
On December 27, 1992, plaintiff signed a lease…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Carbon Processing & Reclamation, LLC v. Valero Marketing & Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
- Strayhorn v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
- Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1997
- Akines v. SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENTDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2007
- Holt v. MacY's Retail Holdings, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.