Legal Opinion

Carbon Processing & Reclamation, LLC v. Valero Marketing & Supply Co.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided October 17, 2011No. 09-2127-STAPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

S. THOMAS ANDERSON, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants Valero Marketing and Supply Co. and Valero Refining Co. — Tennessee, LLC’s (hereinafter “Valero”) Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. # 120) filed on December 29, 2010, as to all claims asserted against them. Plaintiffs Carbon Processing and Reclamation, LLC, and CPR Marine, LLC (hereinafter “CPR”) have filed a response in opposition, to which Valero has replied. For the reasons set forth below, Valero’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART.

Also before…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Orlowski v. BatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
  2. Coleman v. Indymac Venture LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013
  3. Gibson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2014
  4. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. PaniaguaDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013
  5. McMahan Jets, LLC v. Roadlink Transportation, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API