Strayhorn v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING BRAND NAME DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
S.THOMAS ANDERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court are the Brand Name Defendants’ separate Motions for Summary Judgment, all filed on February 10, 2012. Plaintiffs have responded in opposition to Defendants’ Motions, and Defendants have filed reply briefs. For the reasons set forth below, the Brand Name Defendants’ Motions are GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
I. Procedural History
Seven cases involving Defendant Wyeth LLC (“Wyeth”) and the other pharmaceutical companies identified in this Order are currently pending before the Court. These…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sarah Speed v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Theresa Huck v. Wyeth, Inc. D/B/A Wyeth Schwarz Pharma, Inc. and Pliva, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Alboniga v. School Board of Broward County FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Dolin v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Fleming v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.