Legal Opinion
Holt v. MacY's Retail Holdings, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided June 7, 2010No. 1:08-cv-01285PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
J. DANIEL BREEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Cynthia and Timothy Holt, filed suit against Defendants, Macy’s Retail Holdings (“Macy’s”) and Department Stores National Bank (“DSNB”), in the Circuit Court of Madison County, Tennessee, which the Defendants (sometimes collectively “Macy’s”) removed to this Court on November 19, 2008. (Docket Entry (“D.E.”) No. 1.) Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (D.E. No. 69), to which the Holts have responded.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carbon Processing & Reclamation, LLC v. Valero Marketing & Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
- Monroe v. McNairy CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
- Adams v. Delk, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
- American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO v. Rural Media Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Aron J. Austin v. Southern Roofing & Renovations, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.