Legal Opinion

State v. . Corpening

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 12, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Tbe primary purpose of this appeal is to test tbe constitutionality of chapter 14, Public Laws 1925, known as tbe Worthless Check Act of 1925. But tbe record will not permit a determination of tbe question -sought to be presented. S. v. Edwards, 190 N. C., 322. Tbe courts never anticipate a question of constitutional law in advance of tbe necessity of deciding it. Person v. Doughton, 186 N. C., p. 725.

There is a fatal variance between tbe indictment and tbe proof. Tbe charge is that tbe defendant issued and delivered to tbe Lenoir U-Drive-It Company on 10 August, 1925, a worthless check in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. State v. . HarbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. State v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. WhittemoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. State v. . LuedersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. State v. . YarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. State v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API