Legal Opinion

State v. Whittemore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 8, 1961No. 76PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Each defendant’s motion for nonsuit was overruled. Hence the first question for determination is: Was there any evidence to establish each essential ingredient of each crime?

Ervin, J., in his usual clear-cut and concise manner, stated what it was necessary to prove in order to convict a defendant for violating G.S. 14-26. He said: “Three essential ingredients must coexist to render a male person guilty of the statutory felony of obtaining carnal knowledge of a virtuous girl between the specified ages. They are: (1) The male person must have carnal knowledge of the girl; (2) the girl must be…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Fikes v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Daeche v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API