State v. Whittemore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
Each defendant’s motion for nonsuit was overruled. Hence the first question for determination is: Was there any evidence to establish each essential ingredient of each crime?
Ervin, J., in his usual clear-cut and concise manner, stated what it was necessary to prove in order to convict a defendant for violating G.S. 14-26. He said: “Three essential ingredients must coexist to render a male person guilty of the statutory felony of obtaining carnal knowledge of a virtuous girl between the specified ages. They are: (1) The male person must have carnal knowledge of the girl; (2) the girl must be…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Fikes v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Daeche v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.