Legal Opinion

State v. . Edwards

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 21, 1925PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Arcbbold defines a demurrer as a pleading by which tbe legality of tbe last preceding pleading is denied and put in issue; and be says it is pleaded either to the indictment or to a special plea. Cr. Pr. & Pld., 354; S. v. Moody, 150 N. C., 847. The office of a demurrer is to take advantage of defects in substance or in form which appear upon the face of the indictment, thereby forestalling a jDrosecution on the ground that the charges do not constitute a breach of the criminal law; and the issue thus joined is to be determined by the court.

If the present indictment is defective upon its face…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. State v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. State v. . DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. State v. . MoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. State v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. . ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. . YarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. State v. BissetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API