Legal Opinion

State v. . Yarboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1927PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STACY, C.J., and CONNOR, J., concurring; CLARKSON and BROGDEN, JJ., dissenting. The defendant was indicted and convicted of a breach of the following statute, which was ratified 2 March, 1927:

"An act to prevent the giving of worthless checks.
"Whereas, the common practice of giving checks, drafts, and bills of exchange, without first providing funds in or credits with the depository on which the same are drawn, to pay and satisfy the same, tends to create the circulation of worthless paper, overdrafts, bad banking, and check kiting, and a mischief to trade and commerce; and it being the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Halter v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. State v. AverySupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. State v. . PhiferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. . LuedersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. State v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API