Wisniski v. Ong
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Justice.
This action was brought by Ann Ruth Wisniski, plaintiff, alleging facts in a single count which reasonably support both an action for malicious prosecution and for false imprisonment. The matter was duly tried and submitted to a jury. A verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, Ong and Meza. Thereafter, the trial judge entered an order granting a new trial, but subsequently vacated the order and entered an order granting judgment for the defendants n. o. v. This appeal questions the correctness of the latter order.
Although no reason was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glowacki v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Murphy v. RussellArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Swetnam v. FW Woolworth CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Diggs v. Arnold Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Patrick v. WigleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Gortarez v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Sarwark Motor Sales, Inc. v. WoolridgeArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Tate v. ConnelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Watzek v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.