Legal Opinion

Swetnam v. FW Woolworth Company

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1957No. 6168PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

Plaintiff Mary Swetnam and her husband sued defendants F. W. Woolworth Company and John Kerr for damages for false arrest and imprisonment. The case went to trial before a jury, and at the conclusion of the plaintiffs’ case, upon motion of the defendants, the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants and entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiffs now bring this appeal from such judgment.

The events and circumstances upon which the alleged cause of action is based are as follows:

In October, 1952, the plaintiff, Mary Swetnam, while shopping in downtown Phoenix, entered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conoly v. Imperial Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  2. Ong v. Pacific Finance Corp. of CaliforniaArizona Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Cullison v. City of PeoriaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Slade v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Flournoy v. WrenArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Davidson v. WeeArizona Supreme Court · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API