Legal Opinion

Tate v. Connel

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 7, 1966No. 2 CA-CIV 244PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in a malicious prosecution action granting relief to the plaintiff in the sum of $1,000.

On September 4, 1962, the defendant, Lucille Tate, had signed a blank form denominated “Criminal Complaint” in the Justice Court of Precinct No. 2, Cochise County, State of Arizona, after having previously consulted on this same day with Dale Fenter, deputy county attorney of Cochise County. There was an understanding between the justice of the peace and the defendant that, upon a telephone call from the defendant, this complaint would be activated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. PhersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  3. Spector v. SpectorArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Adair v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Hightower v. Union Savings & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Joseph, Md v. Markovitz, MdCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Lindsay v. JenkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MeeksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Bearup v. BearupCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API