Legal Opinion

Gortarez v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1984No. 16560-PRPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*100FELDMAN, Justice.

Petitioner, Ernest Gortarez, Jr., and his parents (plaintiffs) bring this petition for review to contest the trial court’s disposition of their claims against respondents, Smitty’s Super Value, Inc., and its security officer, Daniel Gibson (defendants). Plaintiffs brought suit against defendants for false arrest, false imprisonment, and assault and battery after Gortarez and his cousin, Albert Hernandez, were detained in the parking lot of Smitty’s.

Finding that the circumstances in the case gave reasonable cause for detention, the trial court directed a verdict on the count…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Biddulph OldsmobileArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Lukas v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Weissman v. K-Mart Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Delp v. Zapp's Drug & Variety StoresOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State Board of Dispensing Opticians v. SchwabArizona Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Pool v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. ViaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. NoriegaArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ramon Garcia Maria Morfin Garcia v. United States of America, U.S. Dept. Of Justice & I & NsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API