Rush v. Anestos
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
Plaintiffs initiated this quiet-title action alleging that they had acquired the vendee’s (Anestos’) interest in a real property contract, wherein Trayis and wife were owners and vendors, the said vendee’s interest being sold at a bankruptcy sale. Lock-hart Co., successor to Financial Credit Corporation, was (along with other defendants) alleged to claim some interest in the real property involved because of an assignment of the vendee’s interest executed in its favor to secure a loan to the vendees (Anestos); it was alleged that the interests created by the assignment were…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sigman v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Walker v. NunnenkampIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Kendrick v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Sheehan v. McKinstryOregon Supreme Court · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Marple v. Wyoming Production Credit Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- McGill v. LesterIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- Fulton v. DuroIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Holscher v. JamesIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.