Legal Opinion

City of Reedsport v. HUBBARD ET UX.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1954PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is a suit for strict foreclosure of a contract for the sale of real property, brought by the city of Reedsport, a municipal corporation, as plaintiff, against Russell J. Hubbard and Eva K. Hubbard, his wife, as defendants. Decree was entered in favor of plaintiff; defendants appeal.

On May 6, 1941, plaintiff entered into a written contract to convey certain river frontage and sawmill site property within the city limits of Reedsport, in Douglas county, Oregon, to the defendant Russell J. Hubbard. The city had acquired title to this property by virtue of a conveyance from the county of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Grider v. TurnbowOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Sheehan v. McKinstryOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Fendall v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Bergin v. TempleMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Walker v. MACKEYOregon Supreme Court · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Oregon School Employees Ass'n v. Rainier School District No. 13Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Elwert v. Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1956
  4. W. J. Seufert Land Co. v. GreenfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. MacOmber v. WaxbomOregon Supreme Court · 1958

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API