Sayre v. Mohney
Oregon Supreme Court
From Marion: Geo. H. Burnett, Judge. Action on a promissory note. The court struck out certain allegations of the answer and then sustained a demurrer to the new matter remaining. Judgment having-been entered for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moore.
*239This is an action by Ruth E. Sayre against W. D. Mohney, F. J. Strayer, M. W. Smith, and J. A. Rinehardt to recover the balance due on a promissory note for $1,724.25, executed September 16, 1892, by the defendants and one L. M. Hensel to the plaintiff, and payable on or before two years from that date, with interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent, per annum, payable annually. The summons being served upon Mohney and Smith only, they alone appeared in the action, and, after denying the material allegations of the complaint, which are in the usual form,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frink v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Brown v. Haff & LyonNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
- McIndoe v. MormanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Crary v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Diggle v. BouldenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Sheehan v. McKinstryOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Bembridge v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Todd v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Higinbotham v. FrockOregon Supreme Court · 1906
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.