Legal Opinion

Haddick v. Valor Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 14, 2000No. 3-00-0027PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin

Plaintiff Ella Haddick, administrator of the estate of her son, James Griffith, filed this suit against defendant Valor Insurance Company (Valor), alleging that Valor acted in bad faith when it refused to settle a claim against its policyholder within the policy limits. The trial court granted Valor’s motion to dismiss, finding that Valor had no duty to settle prior to the filing of a lawsuit against its policyholder.

We reverse and hold that an insurance company has a duty to act in good faith in settling a claim against its policyholder in a timely manner both before and after suit is filed.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cramer v. Insurance Exchange AgencyIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Griggs v. BertramSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. City of Wakefield v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Cernocky v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Knotts v. Zurich Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Haddick Ex Rel. Griffith v. Valor InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Kissoondath v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Haddick v. Valor InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Knotts v. Zurich Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API