Legal Opinion

Cernocky v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 14, 1966No. Gen. 65-89PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

This is an action instituted by Louis and Clara Cernocky against the Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, their public liability insurer, to recover $20,000. This sum represents the excess above the plaintiffs’ policy limits which they were compelled to pay to obtain a release of a judgment obtained against them. The plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that the defendant insurance company was guilty of bad faith in refusing to enter into settlement negotiations initiated or sought by Theodore and Jeannette Marquardt, claimants in the personal injury suit resulting in the judgment in excess…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The People v. CarpenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Lindroth v. Walgreen Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hilker v. Western Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Bartolucci v. FalletiIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. City of Wakefield v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Debolt v. Mutual of OmahaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Scroggins v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Bollinger v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Kunkel v. United Security Ins. Co. of New JerseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API