Legal Opinion
Kissoondath v. United States Fire Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 23, 2001No. C4-00-698PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge. *
Appellants assert that the district court committed reversible error in their bad faith claim against respondent insurer by not instructing the jury on the fiduciary duty owed by an insurer to the insured and by giving the jury an erroneous instruction on “good faith.” Appellants also argue the district court committed prejudicial error when it: (1) excluded this court’s opinion affirming the verdict in the underlying case; (2) admitted evidence of appellants’ underinsured motorist benefits; (3) admitted evidence of an edited videotape of one of the appellants;…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Alholm v. WiltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller v. ACE USADistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- North Star Mutual Insurance Co v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. LaRoseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Christian Builders, Inc. v. Cincinnati InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.