Legal Opinion

Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. Hodge

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1993No. 73855PublishedCited by 586 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

We consider here whether a holder in due course of a check is precluded from payment as against the drawer where the check was given in exchange for contract services for which the provider was required to be, but was not, a licensed plumber. We conclude such a claim is not precluded.

BACKGROUND

Pursuant to a written “work order,” Fred Fentress agreed to install a “flood control system” at the home of Eric and Beulah Hodge of Chicago for $900. In partial payment for the work, Beulah Hodge drafted a personal check payable to “Fred Fentress — A-OK Plumbing” for $500 from the Hodges’ joint account…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barber-Colman Co. v. A & K Midwest Insulation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Myers v. Health Specialists, S.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Sierens v. ClausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Pope v. HankeIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Vedder v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by586 opinions

  1. Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Van Meter v. Darien Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Raintree Homes, Inc. v. Village of Long GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Zedella v. GibsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Glisson v. City of MarionIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

581 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API