Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. Hodge
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman
We consider here whether a holder in due course of a check is precluded from payment as against the drawer where the check was given in exchange for contract services for which the provider was required to be, but was not, a licensed plumber. We conclude such a claim is not precluded.
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to a written “work order,” Fred Fentress agreed to install a “flood control system” at the home of Eric and Beulah Hodge of Chicago for $900. In partial payment for the work, Beulah Hodge drafted a personal check payable to “Fred Fentress — A-OK Plumbing” for $500 from the Hodges’ joint account…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barber-Colman Co. v. A & K Midwest Insulation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Myers v. Health Specialists, S.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Sierens v. ClausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Pope v. HankeIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Vedder v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by586 opinions
- Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Van Meter v. Darien Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Raintree Homes, Inc. v. Village of Long GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Zedella v. GibsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Glisson v. City of MarionIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
581 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.