Romanik v. Toro Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
These appeals arise out of an action for damages for injuries to his right hand sustained by plaintiff John G. Romanik, age 13, while operating his father’s Toro snow-thrower. Following the trial court’s approval of the jury’s special verdict for plaintiff, defendant Toro Company (Toro) and defendant Gerald J. Romanik, 1 father of plaintiff, filed separate appeals from an order denying their respective post-trial alternative motions and from the judgment entered against them. The principal issues raised are whether the jury’s findings are adequately supported by the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Balts v. BaltsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Silesky Ex Rel. Silesky v. KelmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Thoreson v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. StreamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- McKay's Family Dodge v. Hardrives, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Hunt v. Regents of UniversityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Wills v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. StreamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.