Legal Opinion

Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Stream

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1980No. 49520, 50644PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

These two appeals raise similar issues regarding the exceptions to the abrogation of parental immunity as adopted by this court in Silesky v. Kelman, 281 Minn. 431, 161 N.W.2d 631 (1968). In both cases, the trial courts concluded that the exceptions were applicable and thus held that the injured children had no actionable claim against their respective parent(s). We reverse.

The operative facts of these appeals have been stipulated to by the respective parties:

Anderson v. Stream v. Anderson

Edward and Ruth Anderson are the parents of Breeanna Anderson, who was born on June 16,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Nolechek v. GesualeNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Nieting v. BlondellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Balts v. BaltsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Mitchell v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Winn v. GilroyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bonin v. VannamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API