Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Regents of University
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 5, 1989No. CO-89-186PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
In this medical malpractice action, a trial jury returned a special verdict finding that respondents Regents of the University of Minnesota, University of Minnesota Hospital, Shelley N. Chou, M.D. and Aizik Wolf, M.D. were not negligent and appellant Patrick F. Hunt sustained no damages. Hunt appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We reverse.
FACTS
Appellant was born on December 31, 1945. Although diagnosed as having cerebral palsy at about 18 months of age, he became a self-sustaining person and a public accountant in Mankato, Minnesota.
Appellant’s…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Alholm v. WiltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. James Edward S.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Hunt v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Hunt v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990