Legal Opinion
Pillowtex Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 16, 1999No. 98-1227PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
Pillowtex Corporation (“Pillowtex”) appeals from the judgment 1 of the United States Court of International Trade. That court sustained the classification by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) of Pillowtex’s cotton-covered down comforters under subheading 9404.90.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 2 (“HTSUS”). Because we hold that the Court of International Trade did not erroneously classify the subject merchandise, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
The merchandise at issue is comforters with 100% cotton outer shells that are stuffed with white duck…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Pima Western, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- North American Processing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Avenues in Leather, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Arko Foods International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Bauer Nike Hockey Usa, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.