Legal Opinion
Pima Western, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 16, 1996No. Court No. 92-04-00285PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*111OPINION
I
Introduction
Wallach, Judge:
Plaintiff, Pima Western, challenges the classification of oleoresin of paprika formulated for use as a food coloring and imported into the United States from Mexico. The Customs Service classified the product under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) as “Coloring matter of vegetable or animal origin (including dyeing extracts but excluding animal black), whether or not chemically defined; preparations as specified in note 3 to this chapter based on coloring matter of vegetable or animal origin [heading 3203.00]: * * * Other “ This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- E.M. Chemicals v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Pillowtex Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- EM Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Minnetonka Brands, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Cummins Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.