Mita Copystar America v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
This customs classification case involves imported toner cartridges that are shaped to fit into specific electrostatic photocopiers. Between 1990 and 1992, the Customs Service classified the cartridges under subheading 3707.90.30 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). That subheading is termed “chemical preparations for photographic uses,” and at the time it carried a duty of 8.5% ad valorem. Appellant Mita Copystar America challenged the classification in the Court of International Trade, arguing that the toner cartridges should have been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Amersham Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- Bruce Duncan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
3Cited by50 opinions
- CamelBak Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Pillowtex Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Lemans Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Wilton Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.