Legal Opinion

Peterson v. City of Ionia

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1908No. Docket No. 74PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Assumpsit by Peter Peterson against the city of Ionia for work and labor. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Mooré, J.

Mr. Peterson brought suit against defendant for a balance claimed to be due him for filling and grading a street. In the early summer of 1905, the defendant city advertised for and solicited bids for work in accordance with a profile and certain specifications. The plaintiff was the lowest bidder and the contract was let to him. On July 3d, the following resolution was adopted by the defendant’s city council:

“Resolved, That the mayor and the city attorney are hereby instructed to enter into a contract with Mr. Peterson for the filling, grading and completion of Cleveland street,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coit v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. East Jordan Lumber Co. v. Village of East JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Carey v. City of East SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Spier v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Chittenden v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Webb v. Township of WakefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Diponio v. City of Garden CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gee v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Hatch v. Maple Valley TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Ely v. Oakland Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API