Legal Opinion

Spier v. City of Kalamazoo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1904No. Docket No. 98PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo; Adams, J. Assumpsit by Samuel O. Spier against the city of Kalamazoo for breach of a contract to open and grade a street. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

This is an action brought upon a contract which plaintiff claims the city made with him. He recovered a judgment. The case is here by writ of error.

It is the claim of plaintiff that the city desired to put a street through his property, and the street commissioner and aldermen composing the street and bridge committee entered into negotiations with him for that purpose; that he made them a proposition that if the city would open up a four-rod street from Davis street to Asylum avenue, and pave the gutters to the top of the hill, and put the street in good shape, he would give the city the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coit v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Holtham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Beattie v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bell v. KirklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Webb v. Township of WakefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. City of Santa Fe v. First Nat. Bank in RatonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. American LaFrance & Foamite Industries, Inc. v. Village of CliffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Diponio v. City of Garden CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API