Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Maple Valley Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1945No. Docket Nos. 1, 2, Calendar Nos. 42,718, 42,719PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiff Hatch brought suit against the defendant school district in assumpsit, adding the common counts, to recover the balance claimed to be due him for furnishing and installing heating and plumbing equipment in a new school building under construction by School District No. 6 Fractional, Trufant, of the townships of Maple Valley in Montcalm county and Spencer in Kent county (hereinafter referred to as the Trufant District). The Petersens, plaintiffs, brought a separate suit in assumpsit and on the common counts against the defendant for hardware, lumber and other merchandise-furnished to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coit v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Elliott v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Peacock v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. McCurdy v. County of ShiawasseeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Webb v. Township of WakefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Redding v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Larion v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Rentschler v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. 1st Source Bank v. Village of StevensvilleDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2013
  5. Division 26 of the Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API