Siskiyou Lumber & Mercantile Co. v. Rostel
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County and from an order denying a new trial. J. S. Beard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
The action is to abate a nuisance and for damages. The complaint alleges as the first cause of action, in-substance, that plaintiff is the owner of certain lots in blocks-27 and 30, in the town of Sisson, in Siskiyou county, upon which-there are valuable buildings, consisting of dwelling-houses, barns, warehouses and stores, and that defendant Eostel is the-owner of lot 17, in block 26, in said town, which last mentioned property is situated on the northwest corner of Walnut and Castle streets—public highways; that defendants are erecting a large building on said lot 17, which is being so…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vanderhurst v. TholckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Marini v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- McCloskey v. KrelingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Gardner v. StroeverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Taylor v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. Van Nuys Lighting DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Dean v. Powell Undertaking Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Ralls v. ParrishTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.