Legal Opinion
Marini v. Graham
California Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1885No. 8718PublishedCited by 23 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city ■ and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. ■
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate.
It appears from the record in the case that section 7 of order No. 1588, of the general orders of the board of supervisors of of the city and county of San Francisco, provides: —
“No person owning or having the control of any building, shall maintain any approach or entrance thereto from, the sidewalk except in accordance with the following provision: —
“1. No entrance which shall be a descent from the sidewalk shall occupy more than three tenths of the width of the sidewalk nor more than four feet thereof. ....
“2. No approach to a building which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arberry v. BeaversTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Harpending v. HaightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Bigley v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- State ex rel. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Linden v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- W. States Gas & Elec. Co. v. Bayside Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Vanderhurst v. TholckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Kappadahl v. Alcan Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.